Short of winning a championship, one final opportunity taken away by the cancellation of the NCAA tournament, senior Sabrina Ionescu did just about everything possible in her four years at Oregon. Now what kind of player will Ionescu, the consensus national player of the year who is projected to be the No. 1 pick in Friday’s WNBA draft (ESPN/ESPN App, 7 p.m. ET), be as a pro?
To help answer that question, let’s compare Ionescu’s performance at Oregon to that of other top WNBA prospects from recent years using advanced statistics.
The biggest strengthsAssist RatePlayerSeasonClassAssists/100WNBASabrina Ionescu2019-20SR13.2–Courtney Vandersloot2009-10JR13.08.2Courtney Vandersloot2010-11SR12.18.2Temeka Johnson2004-05SR11.98.8Chelsea Gray2013-14SR11.96.9Samantha Prahalis2009-10SO11.26.0Sabrina Ionescu2017-18SO11.0–
Ionescu led Division I in assists per game as a senior and was second behind Ivy Wallen of North Alabama in her rate of assisting teammates’ baskets, according to HerHoopStats. So it’s no surprise her assist rate is at the top of her list of statistical strengths. Still, in terms of assists per 100 team plays, it’s somewhat remarkable that Ionescu has the best rate of any future WNBA player in my database — which includes all future WNBA players since 2009-10, most of their senior seasons dating back to 2003-04 and a few individual seasons before that.
2 Related
For the most part, assist rate has translated well to the WNBA, as reflected by players’ assist rate over their first four seasons as pros. (All “WNBA” rates will cover their first four seasons to have a level playing field for players midcareer.)
Courtney Vandersloot, the previous leader in college assist rate among future WNBA players, is the league’s all-time leader in assists per game and has led the league in this category each of the past three seasons, as well as in 2014. Temeka Johnson led the league on a rate basis each of her first two seasons and actually had a better assist rate over her first four seasons than Vandersloot.
Versatility IndexPlayerSeasonPtsRebAstVIWNBASabrina Ionescu2019-2025.614.113.216.9–Nicole Powell2003-0431.318.16.315.38.2Gabby Williams2016-1723.915.78.614.88.2Maya Moore2009-1032.215.26.614.811.2Sabrina Ionescu2017-1827.610.511.014.7–Sabrina Ionescu2018-1926.211.010.814.6–Jayne Appel2008-0929.718.95.214.38.2Alyssa Thomas2012-1325.515.77.214.39.5
Of course, assists were only part of the equation as Ionescu became the Division I career record holder (men’s or women’s) with 26 triple-doubles at Oregon. Statistical analysts generally measure this kind of well-rounded play with the “Versatility Index,” which multiplies points and assists per 100 team plays and rebounds per 100 opportunities and takes the cube root of them to reward balance.
Predictably, Ionescu dominates this leaderboard, with three of the top six years among future WNBA players and far and away the best Versatility Index of the group as a senior. Of these players, only Maya Moore fully translated well-rounded play to the WNBA, where to varying degrees they specialized more. But Ionescu is so far ahead of everyone else, that precedent might not be meaningful for her.
The ‘strength’ that might be a weakness2-point percentage (PGs)PlayerSeasonClass2P%WNBAMoriah Jefferson2013-14SO63.945.9Moriah Jefferson2014-15JR63.445.9Moriah Jefferson2015-16SR63.245.9Maite Cazorla2018-19SR60.042.1Sabrina Ionescu2019-20SR59.0–Kelsey Plum2016-17SR58.939.0Maite Cazorla2017-18JR58.442.1
While Ionescu shot 42% from 3-point range as a freshman, it took her four years in college to become equally efficient inside the arc. She made just 37% of her 2-point attempts as a freshman and dipped a bit to 45% as a junior before surging to 59% this season, one of the best marks for a WNBA-bound point guard.
Sabrina Ionescu, right, upped her 2-point field goal percentage to 59% this past season. Will that translate in the WNBA? Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Accuracy on 2-pointers doesn’t translate particularly well to the pros, and that has especially been the case for the other players on this list. Kelsey Plum, the No. 1 overall pick in 2017, has made better than 37% of her 2s just once in her first three seasons — a key reason Plum has fallen short of expectations. At a listed 5-foot-10, Ionescu is taller than the other point guards on this list, but it wouldn’t be terribly surprising if she struggled to finish early in her career.
The ‘weakness’ that might be a strengthUsage Rate (No. 1 picks, as seniors)PlayerCollegeSeasonUsageWNBASue BirdUConn2001-0220.920.9Breanna StewartUConn2015-1622.326.4Lindsey HardingDuke2006-0723.520.0Tina CharlesUConn2009-1024.226.0Sabrina IonescuOregon2019-2024.7–Diana TaurasiUConn2003-0425.428.2Brittney GrinerBaylor2012-1326.522.1Maya MooreUConn2010-1126.724.9
As a senior, Ionescu actually saw the share of the Ducks’ plays that she finished with a shot attempt, trip to the free throw line or a turnover decline to the lowest mark of her four-year career. Typically, No. 1 picks dominate their teams’ offenses, putting Ionescu in the bottom third of top picks in my database.
Intriguingly, there doesn’t seem to be much relationship between this category and how effective No. 1 picks are in the WNBA. In fact, this group of mostly UConn players was unusually successful in the pros, with four of the seven other players developing into MVPs. The ability to excel without dominating the offense might be a positive indicator for Ionescu’s pro prospects.
Two true weaknessesFree Throw Attempt Rate (No. 1 picks, as seniors)PlayerCollegeSeasonFTA/100WNBASabrina IonescuOregon2019-207.0–Seimone AugustusLSU2005-068.59.4Sue BirdUConn2001-028.67.7Diana TaurasiUConn2003-048.79.7Maya MooreUConn2010-118.98.6
Looking at the same group of players as the previous leaderboard does yield a more legitimate concern: Ionescu’s rate of free throw attempts also dropped as a senior. Only during her sophomore season did Ionescu complete even 10% of her plays with a trip to the line, and none of the No. 1 picks had a free throw rate nearly as low as Ionescu’s as a senior.
On the plus side, this group generally got to the line as frequently or more as pros. Still, if Ionescu’s 2-point percentage tumbles in the WNBA, she’ll need a steady rate of free throw attempts to buoy her efficiency — particularly given Ionescu is such an excellent foul shooter, peaking at 92% as a senior.
Steal Rate (PGs drafted in first round, as seniors)PlayerSeasonSteals/100WNBASydney Wiese2016-171.21.1Kristi Toliver2008-091.71.6Shoni Schimmel2013-141.91.8Kelsey Plum2016-171.91.4Kelsey Mitchell2017-181.91.1Sabrina Ionescu2019-202.2–
Aside from rebounding, Ionescu hasn’t made the same impact on the defensive end as she has on offense. That shows up statistically most clearly in her rate of steals per 100 team plays, which is on the low side for a point guard drafted in the first round. (There are 26 total such players in my database.)
For the most part, the players on this list have struggled defensively in the WNBA, though that hasn’t prevented Kristi Toliver from becoming one of the league’s best point guards. Ionescu’s size should be a plus here, too, but given the underrated value of steals, it would be nice to see her improve in this category, using her ability to see plays develop.
Despite those concerns, this look at Ionescu’s advanced stats suggests she’s not just the top prospect in this year’s draft, but one of the best to come into the WNBA in recent memory. Over the past decade, I’d put her among the top five prospects, along with fellow No. 1 picks Brittney Griner, Maya Moore, Breanna Stewart and A’ja Wilson. Even if Ionescu doesn’t dominate across the board as she did at Oregon, her versatility will give her plenty of ways to impact a game.